Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-22 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-22 Senate Journal Page 3398 SB 77 Message of April 19 was read, stating: Dear President Pearce: Under the authority of Art. II, sec. 15 of the Alaska Constitution, I have vetoed the following bill: HCS for CS for Senate Bill 77 (FIN) An Act relating to management of game populations, to the powers and duties of the commissioner of fish and game, and to the division of game. This administration is committed to sound, scientific management of Alaskas wildlife resources. The intensive management scheme mandated in this bill abandons our goal of responsible wildlife management and fails to recognize long held, successful scientific principles. Alaska enjoys a wildlife management team which has produced some of the worlds most bountiful supplies of game and wildlife. These successes are the result of sound science, management based upon sustained yield, and a thorough public process. The statewide harvest of big game species is high and increasing. Last year, hunters harvested 7,200 moose compared to the 3,300 harvested just two decades ago. Caribou harvest last year exceeded 30,000, more than double what it was just 10 years ago. Brown bear and wolf harvests are the highest on record in 20 years. While populations and harvest of moose may be lower than some desire in a few areas of the state, the Department is working to increase those populations. Our state biologists currently have all the wildlife management tools necessary to accomplish this. Instead of advancing our progress toward the worlds finest professional wildlife management system, this bill would reverse it. Specifically, it defines the sustained yield principle as mandating management for unrealistic levels of moose and caribou populations, 1996-04-22 Senate Journal Page 3399 SB 77 exclusively for consumption by hunters. This would prohibit the Board of Game and the Department of Fish and Game from using the long tried and proven tools of science and public opinion in determining the best use of resources in each game area and managing them based on those findings. Rather than sustaining our game populations, this approach would actually jeopardize the health of some wildlife populations over time. Widespread and continuous killing of wolves and bears would be required to meet the levels of available game populations mandated by this legislation. It requires wolves and bears to be eliminated or maintained at minimal levels, at a high financial cost to the state. Even then, the extreme harvest rates mandated by this legislation, amounting to one third or more of the annual production, could not be sustained over time. Wolf and bear populations are valuable wildlife resources in Alaska for hunters and nonhunters alike, and we must consider this value when making management decisions to enhance consumptive uses. This bill also gives the Board of Game inappropriate and unprecedented budget powers by mandating the Department implement all Board of Game actions regardless of cost. At the same time, this bill would prohibit the use of changes in seasons or bag limits as an intensive management tool. Setting seasons and bag limits is a basic tool of wildlife management and often is all that is needed to correct a short-term decline in a wildlife population. Alaska has an unequaled wildlife management team and system. We can keep it that way by recommitting ourselves to the basic principles of sound science, professional management and an open public process. Sincerely, /s/ Tony Knowles Governor